When I started my first digital picture frame DIY project in 2014, I looked at many potential computer hardware solutions. But then I discovered the Raspberry Pi, and have remained faithful to the platform until today. In this post, I will tell you why I think it remains one of the best, if not the best, hardware solution for a digital picture frame. But there is a big challenge coming.
Small computers with huge potential
The introduction of mini computer boards has created many new applications for home and business.
Whereas a typical Intel or AMD motherboard used to be rather large and demanded a large power supply, the modern single-board ARM computers have a credit card sized form factor and only require a small power supply.
This has made them ideal for all sorts of do-it-yourself projects for hobbyists, but also many commercial applications.
When I looked at possible hardware options in 2014, I came up with these requirements that still hold exactly as they were today:
- 0 dB noise. This means fan-less operation and no other moving parts
- HDMI video output capable of driving a 24 inches monitor with a resolution of 1920 x 1200 px
- A small form factor, ideally credit card sized, which can be glued onto the back of a computer display and does not have a height exceeding 1.2 inches/3 cm
- A power consumption of less than 10 watts
- Enough CPU (main processor) and GPU (graphics) power to run an advanced image viewer software
Regarding an operating system, I quickly concluded that using a Microsoft Windows or Apple macOS operating system would be overkill, so the choice for Linux was an obvious one.
Back then, the Raspberry Pi was the clear leader in minicomputers and the easy choice for my project. But in 2019, would I still recommend it as the best option?
Another fruit company conquers the world
The Raspberry Pi is the brand name for a series of small single-board computers developed by a foundation in the UK. It intended to promote computer science in schools and developing countries, and yes, they have reached that goal.
Last year over 20 million units of these credit card sized minicomputers were sold worldwide, and it triggered a whole generation of young and old(er) people to learn about programming.
The Raspberry Pi may be a bit too slow for the use in an office, but it is great for tinkering with electronics, experimenting, home automation and generally for projects called the Internet of Things (IoT). And it proved to be the perfect platform for my digital picture frame project.
The technical data sheet sounds unimpressive. The very latest model of the Raspberry family, the Pi 3 B+ only offers a modest CPU performance and memory. But still, this is probably more computing power than Neil Armstrong and his colleagues had in their capsule for the first moon landing and plenty for a digital picture frame project.
What I like about it is the average power consumption of 3 watts which is probably less than the standby power of your television. Whatever your motive may be to keep an eye on power consumption, it just feels right to have a device that is very energy efficient.
It only costs around US$35/€35 so experimenting with it is not a too expensive endeavor to undertake. You need to add a power supply, a case and an SD card, so the final tab will be around 60 but still reasonable.
No great hardware can thrive without an ecosystem of software developers and this is where the Raspberry Pi shines especially bright. Millions of enthusiastic fans resulted in a huge number of Raspberry Pi forums, clubs and developers all around the world openly sharing their knowledge and findings to build yet another amazing application.
Even the model from 2014, the Raspberry Pi 2 Model B, had enough horsepower for my digital picture frame. Over four years later, the original picture frame is still running flawlessly much to the delight of friends & family.
And unlike mobile phone operating systems which appear to get slower with every upgrade on the same hardware platform, this is not the case with Raspbian, the Raspberry Pi operating system, a Debian derivative (Linux).
However, today in 2019, there are a number of hardware alternatives to choose from.
Let’s start with the old bull.
Raspberry Pi 3 B+
The latest Raspberry Pi 3 B+ released in late 2018 is a modest upgrade to his predecessors. The CPU has been upgraded to 1.4 GHz and 5 GHz onboard Wifi has now been included which is very nice because it avoids the dongle and any driver issues that you might encounter. Bluetooth 4.2 is also part of the standard package.
What I find a bit inconvenient in the latest model, is that the SD card slot has no spring ejection anymore. When I first got it, I thought that my model was broken and was ready to send it back. But after some internet research, I discovered that this was the new technical design. My worry that it could slide out is probably unfounded in a digital picture frame application, but I prefer tight connectors. Also, when your case is fastened onto a surface (in my case glued to the back of the monitor), you now have to take the motherboard out of the case to change the SD card. This was easier with previous models although taking the SD card out always required long fingernails or something like a paper clip.
However, to put this into perspective: The addition of 5 GHz Wifi is a big plus, the faster CPU very nice and I only really change the SD card during testing and setting up, so it’s not much of a deal.
The size hasn’t changed, and power consumption with the digital picture frame application running remains a 3 watts, about 1 watt more than with the older model 2B.
It still costs US$35/€35 plus power supply and SD card. You save yourself the wifi dongle now, so the price has gone down slightly.
The clone wars
The success of the Raspberry Pi has inspired many vendors to come up with their own brands. It’s a bit like the clone wars of the 1980s after the launch of the IBM PC. There is a Banana Pi, an Orange Pi, a NanoPi and a few more with or without “Pi” in their name.
The wording “clone” is technically not quite correct as there is no direct compatibility with the hardware of the original Raspberry Pi.
So, if something works on the Raspberry Pi, it is not guaranteed to work on the clone as driver issues can introduce a lot of complications. “Pi” vendors try to benefit from the positive image of the Raspberry Pi series, but in reality, the clone may have little to do with the original.
None of them can really beat the Raspberry Pi on price. Most of them come with a more performant CPU, but this is not relevant for a digital picture frame application. My average CPU load on the Raspberry Pi 3 B+ is less than 5%, so there is just no need for more horsepower.
The difference regarding software and community support means clones are only a suitable substitute in some cases and you may end up spending many hours fixing bugs that you don’t see on a Raspberry Pi.
All the tutorials on this website are working on a Raspberry Pi computer. There is no guarantee that this will work on any of the other Pis.
I fail to see a real advantage in recommending the Pi clones. They are often more expensive and don’t necessarily have anything that would make a real difference for this use case.
There is one issue where I am not happy with the Raspberry Pi, even with the latest 3 B+ models. The issue is the lack of 4K support.
The Raspberry Pi in combination with a 24 inches monitor running at 1920 x 1200 px is a match made in heaven. It’s cheap, proven, reliable and well supported by hardware manufacturers and the overall global fan community.
But when the itch starts and you want to use larger displays with a 4K resolution, you are hitting a dead end with the Raspberry Pi.
This is where other ARM-based mini computers have been able to offer a real advantage. At least in theory, because I am hearing about a number of driver issues that make it difficult to exploit this advantage.
There is one board that got my attention which may become more interesting for digital picture frame applications in the future.
Introduced already by HardKernel in 2016, the ODROID-C2 brings a significant performance boost at a similar price as the Raspberry Pi 3. But the real gem is that it has a much more performant graphics processor unit, the ARM Mali 450, which allows a resolution of 3840 x 2400 px (4K). Wifi and Bluetooth are not included on board, but that’s a minor inconvenience and outweighed by its graphical capabilities.
In a way, I somewhat find it a bit odd that there hasn’t been an upgrade of the C2 for two years, so I am not entirely sure what to make of this board.
However, I am intrigued by the ODROID-C2. The ODROID support community is gaining momentum which is a crucial requirement for do-it-yourself projects.
I am not aware of any commercial digital picture frame vendors that are using the ODROID-C2. It may be possible that Memento Smart Frame have used them in their commercial products but Memento’s last sign of life is from summer 2017, so I guess they went out of business.
I found one good example of a 4K digital picture frame based on an ODROID-C2 on the internet, but it uses a simple FEH image viewer and not something which provides beautiful image transitions like the Pi3D software which at this point is not compatible with the ODROID-C2. This is essential to the digital picture frame experience and makes a huge difference.
The 4K road ahead
There is always this itch to improve. To build something which is better.
And one day, I will post a tutorial on how to make a great digital picture frame with outstanding image transitions in 4K.
Two issues are keeping me from building it today.
One is the lack of a decent 27 or 30 inches high 4K monitor with an aspect ratio of 16:10. If they exist, please send me an email. I haven’t been able to find them except for some extremely bulky and expensive models for medical applications. 16:10 is important to avoid cropping too much from a standard 3:2 camera photo.
The other one is a Pi3D compatible ARM board. Pi3D is an outstanding image transition software (and a lot more) which turns a homemade digital picture frame into a great visual experience. There will shortly be an article on this outstanding piece of software.
So, what are the options? The easiest is to wait for a new Raspberry Pi generation with 4K video capabilities. Will that happen anytime in the coming two years? Only Eben Upton, the founder of the Raspberry Pi initiative, and his colleagues know, and they will probably not disclose it today.
On the other hand, I may make sense to explore the ODROID-C2 (and potential successor model) option. But this road may be a rough one with an open ending.
But what about Intel NUC and similarly sized minicomputers? The reason why I have not included them in this post is that their price is about ten times that of the Raspberry Pi and they have much larger physical dimensions and the space behind the monitor is very limited.
If you want to build a digital picture frame today, pick a Raspberry Pi 3 B+ as your computing hardware of choice.
CPU performance doesn’t matter for the digital picture frame use case. What matters is compatibility, reliability and clear instructions that you can follow.
The Raspberry Pi has the most substantial following of any ARM single-board computer. The amount of guides, tutorials, and software available for the Raspberry Pi is unmatched by any other board.
All the DIY tutorials on this site are currently for the Raspberry Pi. So if you are interested in producing a result quickly and reliably, this is the road to take.